Re: [asa] discussion of concordism essay

From: Bill Hamilton <>
Date: Thu Sep 14 2006 - 22:12:29 EDT

--- Charles Carrigan <> wrote:

> The view that the bible is "inerrantly revealing the will of God concerning
> us in all things necessary to our salvation" is a view that preserves the
> divine side of revelation without reducing the human side to robotic
> dictation. Further, such a view easily accommodates views of origins that
> are an alternative to YEC. Finally, it is a view that in my opinion is
> theologically consistent with divine kenosis.
> I'm sure that all Christians believe that the scriptures are theologically
> inerrant. The question remains as to whether or not we can, or even should,
> say it is also inerrant in other domains.
I have frequently said that the really important meaning of inerrancy is that
the Scriptures will infallibly guide those who truly seek to know God. However,
certain kinds of errors in Scripture could be disconcerting. For example Luke 2
says "This was the first census that took place while Quirinius was governor of
Syria." Now if we found that there never was a Quirinius who was governor of
Syria, perhaps that wouldn't shake our faith, but I for one would wonder how
God allowed Luke to be so careless about his history. One can find other
examples. Accurate discussion of details of history and daily life help to
establish Scripture as an authentic account. My question is, "How much
inaccuracy can we tolerate?"

Bill Hamilton
William E. Hamilton, Jr., Ph.D.
248.652.4148 (home) 248.821.8156 (mobile)
"...If God is for us, who is against us?" Rom 8:31

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

To unsubscribe, send a message to with
"unsubscribe asa" (no quotes) as the body of the message.
Received on Thu Sep 14 22:12:56 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 14 2006 - 22:12:56 EDT