Re: The death of the RTB model

From: David Opderbeck <dopderbeck@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Feb 16 2006 - 13:03:30 EST

*How silly!*

If taking the incarnation seriously is "silly," then call me a fool. I
think I'm in pretty good company.

On 2/16/06, RFaussette@aol.com <RFaussette@aol.com> wrote:
>
> In a message dated 2/16/2006 12:04:14 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> dopderbeck@gmail.com writes:
>
> Well, yes. He would be, as you say, "only a man." The kenosis, the
> atonement, the resurretion -- the Gospel -- would have no real meaning at
> all. The statement "Jesus is Lord" would be at best vaucous, at worst a
> sacriligious lie.
>
> How silly! How a few of you circle the wagons when the metaphysics is
> broached. See my reply to Janice. I posed a hypothetical expressing the
> strength of my faith in the face of modern scholarship to show Dick the
> perspective necessary to read the allegories in genesis, and all a few of
> you saw was a house of cards ready to fall. There's no faith there!
>
> rich faussette
>
Received on Thu Feb 16 13:04:06 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 16 2006 - 13:04:06 EST