Re: Self-deception, faith, and scepticism

From: Bill Hamilton <>
Date: Wed Feb 15 2006 - 11:56:15 EST

--- David Opderbeck <> wrote:

> Ok, I think we are on the same page. But about this: "*Apart from invoking
> the fine tuning of the universe (which you could say is a weak form of the
> Intelligent Design hypothesis), there isn't any evidence I can offer him"
> *do
> you mean evidence from natural science? There certainly are many more
> evidences apart from natural science that support theism. In addition to
> the argument from design / teleological argument / and cosmological argument
> (which are strong even apart from the particular arguments of ID), there is
> the moral argument, the argument from religious need, the argument from joy,
> the ontological argument, historical arguments concerning the life, death
> and resurrection of Christ and growth of the Church, and experiential
> arguments from the lives of individual believers, among others.
All of these arguments are valuable and should be known by every Christian.
However, if one of them convinces a nonbeliever, then he simply has made an
intellectual assent to the existence of God (ala Anthony Flew) Perhaps he will
take the next step: a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, but just
intellectually acknowledging God doesn't guarantee it. Here is where personal
testimony comes in.

Bill Hamilton
William E. Hamilton, Jr., Ph.D.
586.986.1474 (work) 248.652.4148 (home) 248.303.8651 (mobile)
"...If God is for us, who is against us?" Rom 8:31

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Received on Wed Feb 15 11:57:15 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 15 2006 - 11:57:16 EST