RE: Judge Jones' decision

From: Stephen J. Krogh, P.G. <panterragroup@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue Dec 20 2005 - 17:34:25 EST

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
> Behalf Of Terry M. Gray
> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 4:07 PM
> To: asa@calvin.edu
> Subject: Re: Judge Jones' decision
>
>
> On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Cornelius Hunter wrote:
>
> > Well you've got your work cut out for you. This decision is over
> > reaching and committed to fallacious claims. One could spend quite
> > some time dissecting it. This is not the first time that the legal
> > process has so degraded. I think the service you could do Ted would
> > be to show how easily a legal decision can go off the deep end. The
> > warfare thesis now has the legal stamp of approval.

> Cornelius,
>
> Interesting that you would read it this way in light of:
>
> "Repeatedly in this trial, Plaintiffs’ scientific experts testified
> that the theory of evolution represents good science, is
> overwhelmingly accepted by the
> scientific community, and that it in no way conflicts with, nor does
> it deny, the existence of a divine creator."
>
> I know that you disagree with the first two claims, but to say that
> the judge's ruling represents the warfare thesis in light of the
> third claim is just to hear what you want to hear.
>
> TG

Behe also didn't help his case when he admitted on the stand that ID is not
scientific.

Instead, Behe wants redefine “theory” - and admitted that this new
definition is so broad it would also include astrology.

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/207 - Release Date: 12/19/2005
Received on Tue Dec 20 17:36:12 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 20 2005 - 17:36:12 EST