Re: Kuwait's biggest field starts to run out of oil

From: <>
Date: Tue Nov 15 2005 - 09:31:34 EST

I have a question about this forum and this is not a
veiled complaint. I am sincerely seeking clarification.
 I appreciate posts from Glenn on this issue.

But last week, or maybe the week before, there were
complaints about off topic posts from Janice regarding the
history of the Crusades.

So I am looking for some clarification on what is
considered on topic, and what isnt for this forum.

It may very well be the direction a thread takes instead
of the topic itself that makes it inappropriate, and I
agree that in some cases threads need to be edited to
remain on topic, but personally I am more in favor of
broader acceptance of subject matter, than narrower.

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 03:23:18 -0800 (PST)
  Glenn Morton <> wrote:
> I fear that Kenneth Deffeyes, author of Hubbert's
>Peak, may be right. Last Fall, I met him at the Society
>of Petroleum Engineers conference. I told him I had seen
>him quoted as believing that peak oil would occur
>Thanksgiving 2005. I then told him that I didn't
>beleieve anyone could pick it that closely. He laughed,
>said it would be Thanksgiving this year plus or minus 3
>weeks. I think I reported this last year. But then he
>grew serious and said he didn't think it would be much
>past the middle of 2006 when Peak oil occurs. Given the
>news I was sent today, I fear that Thanksgiving may
>indeed be peak oil. Of the four largest fields in the
>world, all of them are now in decline. They produce 10%
>of the world's oil. I don't see how they can be replaced
>given the industries inability to find oil in sufficient
> If this is the time of peak oil, heaven help us all.
>The freind that sent this link to me said, "You are
>entering the depletion zone, please to not adjust your
>television set."
> Burgan is the 2nd largest by reserves, 3rd largest by
>daily production--Cantarell is the 2nd largest by daily
>production and it has been announced that it will begin
>its decline next year (although it is already off peak
> It was an incredible revelation last week that the
>second largest oil field in the world is exhausted and
>past its peak output. Yet that is what the Kuwait Oil
>Company revealed about its Burgan field.
> Kuwait: Saturday, November 12 - 2005 at 08:46
> The peak output of the Burgan oil field will now be
>around 1.7 million barrels per day, and not the two
>million barrels per day forecast for the rest of the
>field's 30 to 40 years of life, Chairman Farouk Al Zanki
>told Bloomberg.
> He said that engineers had tried to maintain 1.9 million
>barrels per day but that 1.7 million is the optimum rate.
>Kuwait will now spend some $3 million a year for the next
>year to boost output and exports from other fields.
> However, it is surely a landmark moment when the world's
>second largest oil field begins to run dry. For Burgan
>has been pumping oil for almost 60 years and accounts for
>more than half of Kuwait's proven oil reserves. This is
>also not what forecasters are currently assuming.
>Forecasts wrong
> Last week the International Energy Agency's report said
>output from the Greater Burgan area will be 1.64 million
>barrels a day in 2020 and 1.53 million barrels per day in
>2030. Is this now a realistic scenario?
> The news about the Burgan oil field also lends credence
>to the controversial opinions of investment banker and
>geologist Matthew Simmons. His book 'Twilight in the
>Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy'
>claims that the ageing Saudi oil filed also face serious
>production falls.
> The implications for the global economy are indeed
>serious. If the world oil supply begins to run dry then
>the upward pressure on oil prices will be inexorable. For
>the oil producers this will come as a compensation for
>declining output, and cushion them against an economic
> However, the oil consumers then face a major energy
>crisis. Industrialized economies are still far too
>dependent on oil. And the pricing mechanism of declining
>oil reserves will press them into further diversification
>of energy supplies, particularly nuclear, wind and solar
> Geological facts
> All this was foreshadowed in the energy crisis of the
>late 1970s when a serious inflection in oil supply by the
>year 2000 was clearly forecast. How ironic that those
>earlier forecasts now look correct, while more modern and
>recent forecasts begin to look over optimistic and
>out-of-date with geological reality.
> Nobody can change the geology, and forces of nature that
>laid down reserves of oil and gas over millions and
>millions of years. Could it be that we have been blinded
>by technological advances into thinking that there is
>some way to beat nature?
> The natural world has an uncanny ability to hit back at
>the arrogance of man, and perhaps a reassessment of
>reality at this point is called for, rather than a
>reliance on oil statistics that may owe more to political
>maneuvering than geological facts.
> glenn
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one
Received on Tue Nov 15 09:33:07 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 15 2005 - 09:33:07 EST