RE: Panda's from 1995

From: Alexanian, Moorad <>
Date: Sat Nov 12 2005 - 18:42:17 EST

I do not see any difference whatsoever between scientifically detecting common descent and the transition of "animal man" to "human man." One does not invoke God in the former, why, then, invoke it in the latter?



From: on behalf of Pim van Meurs
Sent: Sat 11/12/2005 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: Panda's from 1995

Alexanian, Moorad wrote:

>Theistic evolutionists would have to invoke a time in history when "animal man" became "human man" by an act of God. How does that differ from those who profess ID and consider innervations by God in the functioning of Nature? Is it a difference in kind or degree?
IDC proposes that such interventions can actually be detected
scientifically. Lacking such evidence they can always retreat to a front
loading perspective (as some of them, somewhat reluctantly) seem to be
Received on Sat Nov 12 18:43:01 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Nov 12 2005 - 18:43:01 EST