RE: Behe testimony at Dover trial

From: Pim van Meurs <>
Date: Thu Oct 20 2005 - 21:41:49 EDT

--- Denyse O'Leary <> wrote:

> "Seems that Behe indeed accepted astrology as a
> science under his
> definitions.I can't wait to see the transcripts."
> You don't need to wait to see the transcripts. You
> can ask for
> clarification, as I have done:

Huh? You mean you are repeating DI spin? How is this
'asking for clarification'?

Amazing to see how evolutionnews is spinning its
wheels right now to address the devastating cross of

Behe under cross clearly accepted astrology as falling
within his definition of 'science'.

In other words, astrology under today's definitions by
Behe would still be scientific.

Boy the DI spin is making me quite dizzy...
Received on Thu Oct 20 21:43:22 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 20 2005 - 21:43:22 EDT