Re: What goes around comes around

From: Pim van Meurs <>
Date: Sun Oct 09 2005 - 23:31:56 EDT

janice matchett wrote:

> At 10:57 PM 10/9/2005, Pim van Meurs wrote:
> #2#2# As an apparent expert on what constitutes embarassing nonsense,
> you snipped out what the school teaches that
> you say has "no foundation in reality". I wouldn't say it has "no"
> foundation, but I would say it has "little" foundation.

Nothing embarassing there, I was referrring to your comment about 'under
the guise of science'

Could you share with us what exactly your objections may be that caused
you to make you statement and what is the direction that children are
being led into?

Details would help, an argument would truely amaze me.
Received on Sun Oct 9 23:34:19 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 09 2005 - 23:34:19 EDT