Re: What goes around comes around

From: Pim van Meurs <>
Date: Sat Oct 08 2005 - 14:37:52 EDT

Cornelius Hunter wrote:

> Preston:
> Preston:
> These results are predicated on the assumption that evolution is true.
> Of course there is nothing wrong with this (Kuhn calls it "normal
> science"), but we need to be careful in using the results outside of
> normal science; that is, as evidence for evolution.

Seems that you are still struggling with this concept. Internal
consistency based on a well supported assumption is hjardly wrong. What
do you mean by "applying this outside of 'normal science'" and see this
as evidence for evolution.

And you are still confused about your claim that there are significant
problems for common descent. Repeating your wishes does not make them
come true however.

Of course ID still has no scientifc explanations.

Received on Sat Oct 8 14:41:43 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 08 2005 - 14:41:43 EDT