Re: It's the Bible or evolution

From: Pim van Meurs <>
Date: Thu Sep 29 2005 - 22:24:11 EDT

Cornelius Hunter wrote:

>> verified and verifiable consequences. For evolution, he gave several
>> such
>> examples, esp the recent discovery of pseudogenes in identical
>> locations for
>> humans and some other primates--a "fact" that favors the "theory" of
>> evolution
> It does *not* favor evolution.

It's just that evolution is the only theory that presents an explanation
for them. Of course you are right, since there is no competing theory,
it does not necessary 'favor' evolution. It's just that evolution is the
only scientific explanation of these data.
One may object that 'a designer could explain it' but without
understanding motive, means, opportunities etc, the argument that a
designer could explain is is meaningless.
Received on Thu Sep 29 22:26:10 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 29 2005 - 22:26:10 EDT