I fear you are ignoring /consequentia mirabilis/ which, for example,
accepting your statements, provides validly:
God is atemporal.
God is temporal.
Therefore, Bill Hamilton is god.
Therefore, Bill Hamilton is the devil.
Therefore, Burgy is prouder than Satan.
Therefore, any other nonsense you care to add.
As for me, I'll stand by logical consistency.
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Bill Hamilton
Dave wrote: "
If I understand your claim, God isn't smart enough to anticipate the
total consequences, so has to try new things out. Are you joining the
contemporary groups who deny omniscience to the deity?"
That's not what I'm arguing at all. God is omniscient, so of course he
can anticipate the consequences of any action he takes. What I'm arguing
is that he may interact with nature because he _chooses_ to. I have a
Panasonic bread maker at home. It makes great bread, but on occasion I
decide that just because I want to feel the dough under my hands, I'm
going to make a loaf of bread the old-fashioned way. I don't have to make
it myself to see what happens -- I _know_ what's going to happen (if I
follow the recipe). I just _like_ carrying out the process myself. In
any case I think I have the record on my side: God has entered time many
times, as with Abraham, Jacob, and of course the incarnation and Christ's
To say that he can't be temporal (as well as outside of time) limits him.
William E. Hamilton, Jr., Ph.D.
586.986.1474 (work) 248.652.4148 (home) 248.303.8651 (mobile)
"...If God is for us, who is against us?" Rom 8:31
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Received on Tue Aug 23 15:43:57 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 23 2005 - 15:43:57 EDT