Re: agreeing about a mere creation?

From: D. F. Siemens, Jr. <dfsiemensjr@juno.com>
Date: Mon Aug 22 2005 - 13:26:30 EDT

Bill, what you draw from my statement (a reductio ad absurdum) is exactly
my point. A tinkering God is reduced to near human "dimensions." It
denies God's eternity.
Dave

On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Bill Hamilton
<williamehamiltonjr@yahoo.com> writes:

"D. F. Siemens, Jr." <dfsiemensjr@juno.com> wrote:

However we try to understand
ultimate matters, we must not view God as reduced to our dimensions and
abilities.
Dave

Dave, it seems to me that you did exactly that in response to one of my
posts last week. You said(approximate reconstruction from memory) "if God
tinkers [with nature] then he must be temporal." I don't think you can
limit God like that.

Bill Hamilton
William E. Hamilton, Jr., Ph.D.
586.986.1474 (work) 248.652.4148 (home) 248.303.8651 (mobile)
"...If God is for us, who is against us?" Rom 8:31
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Mon Aug 22 15:05:39 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 22 2005 - 15:05:39 EDT