Re: Mountains

From: Michael Roberts <>
Date: Mon Apr 18 2005 - 08:37:27 EDT

Bill wrote> BP: I try to stay agnostic on the age of the earth.

Michael replies; when I go in the mountains under snow and ice I also try to
stay agnostic about the value of "g" and the coeficient of friction of ice.
After all I have never measured them and as most experiments have not been
done by born-again Chrsitans I am sceptical. It's fantastic to climb a sheer
face with a 1500ft drop below you. I also beleive that as boiling water on
top of everest is only hot and not scalding I can pour boiling water over
others to warm them up. What say ye?

If I were to take a stand based on the evidence as I understand it at this
time, I would say it is old.

Pray, what evidence is there that the earth is young?

> BP: Uniformitarian in the sense that the Himalayas are 50 million years
old instead of only 5 my old.

What do you mean by Uniformitarain? Far to often it is bandied about by
those who know nothing about Lyell, or how geologists actually do geology

Received on Mon Apr 18 08:43:47 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 18 2005 - 08:43:51 EDT