Re: Taking responsibility

From: Steven Carr <Steven@bowness.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:57:04 EST

In message <014f01c536eb$2f75f040$44f3cdd9@D9D1ZJ1J>, Michael Roberts
<michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk> writes
>I am going to Grasmere tomorrow past Rydal church where WWordsworth was
>churchwarden. Now tell me what was the tune that Wordsworth's daffodils were
>dancing to and also were dancing to when I cycled past loads of dafs in the
>Lakes on Tuesday?
>Have you ever heard of Hermann Neutics? He has a lot to say about reading
>any kind of literature
>
>Michael who is not to be taken literally!

CARR
So you don't think Jesus really should be taken literally when he said
that 'Yes, I tell you, this generation will be held responsible for it
all.'?

(BTW, I don't take the New Testament literally)

CARR
>> Luke 11
>> 50 Therefore this generation will be held responsible for the blood of
>> all the prophets that has been shed since the beginning of the world,
>> from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, who was killed between
>> the altar and the sanctuary.
>Yes, I tell you, this generation will be
>> held responsible for it all.

>> Why should Jesus hold people responsible for a murder which happened
>> before any of them were born, especially if Abel never existed?

-- 
Steven Carr
Received on Fri Apr 1 13:59:02 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:59:03 EST