Re: A word of appreciation

From: D. F. Siemens, Jr. <>
Date: Sat Sep 18 2004 - 00:22:33 EDT

CL-UK simply agrees with most of us, but is more determined not to be
sidetracked. What is "self-evident truth" to you is silly nonsense to me.
One clear reason for my stand is that the omniscient deity will know that
pi and epsilon are transcendental and will not inspire incorrect values
in his truthful revelation. To you, I am obscurantist. But is a proper
regard for the knowledge and power of God benighted?

I recall the story of the mother watching her son as the platoon marched
by and saying, "Everybody's out of step but my son John." You take the
appraisal a step further, "Everybody's out of step but me." Can anything
I say change your mind? No, because you are committed to the declaration,
"Everybody's out of step but me."

With the vast majority,

On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:46:40 +0100 "Vernon Jenkins"
<> writes:
To the Forum

As a YEC, and declaring my belief in the potency of the
numero-geometrical structure underlying the Hebrew words of Genesis 1:1,
I recently asked to be subscribed to Creation Link UK. Here are some of
the moderators' comments:

"As moderators we are agreed that CL-UK does not exist for the discussion
Biblical numerics. Therefore if we were to subscribe you, it would be on
condition that you undertake *not* to raise the subject (directly or
indirectly) on the list. We would therefore appreciate it if you would
confirm with us that your interest in creation issues is wider than
you deal with on the web pages you listed and that you are prepared to
undertake not to discuss or promote your own (or other peoples') theories
concerning Biblical numerics through CL-UK. If you agree to this
restriction, but then in the future do not keep to it, we would remove
from the list without further discussion."

Needless to say, I did not pursue this potential avenue for the
proclamation of an empirical truth that has much to do with our
understanding of the Creator and His regard for those engaged in the
present debate. I therefore all the more appreciate the fact that no such
restrictions have been placed upon me by the moderator of this forum.
But, of course, the obscurantist attitude to my findings - as noted above
- extends across the board, and I have to ask What is it about these
particular _self-evident truths_ that invokes responses ranging through
incredulity, indifference or revulsion, to amusement? Am I to understand
that _fact_ no longer interests the inquiring mind? Why is it that those
claiming to love truth persist in following flights of fancy?

Appreciative, but perplexed,

Received on Sat Sep 18 00:54:34 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 18 2004 - 00:54:35 EDT