Re: (no subject)

From: Jan de Koning <>
Date: Mon May 31 2004 - 14:33:17 EDT

At 02:18 PM 01/07/2004 -0400, wallyshoes wrote:
>John W Burgeson wrote:
> >
> > "2.) There are indeed financial benefits to being married. Some of
>them I
> > dislike -- like all the social security benefits etc. We :libertarians
> > would
> > be happier if these social programs never came into existence. The
> > worked fine before them. There are numerous people trying to stick
> > hands in the taxpayers pockets. Now there will be more."
> >
> > Yeah. The world worked fine. For those who had wealth. For those left
> > the short end of the stick, too bad.
> >
> > "Let them eat cake," said Marie. She got what she deserved.
>Typical burgy cynicism.
>I was dirt poor as a kid. & the system worked fine without the
>Charities did what needed to be done. If you were sick, you got heath
>(doctor or hospital) for little or for zero $. If you were an orphan,
>were homes for you and you had the benefits that most medium income
>did. I knew orphans and later worked for one. If you were old and
>without a
>support system, charities took care of you.
>It is only you political liberals who think that the government is the
>solution to all our social problems.

Not only the liberals, so say the conservatives. But read the Bible on
poverty, and how we should react: Ezekiel 16: 49 ff. where God tells us
how to deal with poverty. In the present circumstances voluntary giving is
not enough, as a matter of fact, I read that personal giving is down to
about 2% of income on average. The Lord tells us in Ezekiel how He will
deal with those who do not want to deal with the issue of poverty.

Jan de Koning
Received on Mon May 31 16:43:47 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 16:43:48 EDT