Re: Peeved at the pump

From: Howard J. Van Till <>
Date: Sat May 15 2004 - 17:08:28 EDT

On 5/15/04 12:38 PM, "Glenn Morton" <> wrote:

> Sorry to have slipped into such vitriolic sarcasm.

No problem. Candor get things on the table quickly.

> I do get rather
> tired of 'solutions' which don't solve a thing and I still contend,
> Howard, that the poor can't afford 75 dollars to fill up a gas tank once
> a week and at the same time afford a 12,000 GBP car, especially when in
> Britain the government taxes both items to the hilt.

OK, then some clever person like yourself could devise a gas tax credit
system for low income households. There are already a zillion other kinds of
credits to check out on the 1040 forms. Why not add one more?

> You can't ensure
> that taxes would go for anything in energy and even if it did, the
> government usually funds uneconomic forms of energy which means a waste
> of energy. Once a government has taxes, they use the taxes for other
> things. In Texas they said we would use the lottery for education. Only
> part of it was used for education. Can't trust a politician to keep his
> word. Thus taxing merely removes money from people's pockets and does
> little of value.

The problem you identify here is not a specific problem with a gasoline tax,
but a larger problem with the way in which a government is held accountable
for its use of our tax dollars.

Given your dislike for what I have proposed as one way (taxation) to deal
with the problem of people failing to understand the Value of oil, what is
your solution? Or is there none?

Received on Sat May 15 17:09:05 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 15 2004 - 17:09:06 EDT