Re: Saudi oil field declines.

From: Michael Roberts <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
Date: Thu Apr 29 2004 - 11:38:14 EDT

Wasn't it oily!

Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: "wallyshoes" <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
To: <dlbarber1954@verizon.net>
Cc: "Glenn Morton" <glennmorton@entouch.net>; <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: Saudi oil field declines.

> Finally someone who offers a ray of hope ;)
>
> Walt
>
>
> dlbarber1954@verizon.net wrote:
>
> > ============================================================
> > From: "Glenn Morton" <glennmorton@entouch.net>
> > Date: 2004/04/29 Thu AM 05:26:27 CDT
> > To: "'wallyshoes'" <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
> > CC: <asa@calvin.edu>
> > Subject: RE: Saudi oil field declines.
> > <snip> I can be cheery. I can lie as in the
> > following sentence. There is enough oil to last a thousand years and we
> > humans will grow fat, with big brains living off the fat of the land.
<snip>
> > ============================================================
> >
> > I like this theory. It seems to suggest that incontroverable evidence
that we humans are indeed growing fat would tend to confirm the hypothesis
that there is enough oil to last a thousand years.
> >
> > Doug Barber
> > Crisfield, MD
>
> --
> ===================================
> Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
>
> In any consistent theory, there must
> exist true but not provable statements.
> (Godel's Theorem)
>
> You can only find the truth with logic
> If you have already found the truth
> without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
> ===================================
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Apr 29 12:12:50 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 29 2004 - 12:12:52 EDT