Re: A Peace Proposal

From: wallyshoes <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri Jan 30 2004 - 09:49:57 EST

George Murphy wrote:

> wallyshoes wrote:
> >
> > Hello john,
> >
> > As one might expect, a lot of negativity arises on this site and others.
> >
> > Can you email us (maybe even privately) to inform us as to how we can endorse
> > such such a proposal in a positive fashion!
>
> Perhaps I'm being unduly sensitive but since my remarks on this Peace Proposal
> may be understood as negative, further explanation may be helpful.
> A clear statement that would enable YECs and OECs (the latter understood in a
> broad sense) to agree that they can recognize one another as Christians would be of
> value. But nothing will be gained with a statement that is inaccurate &/or raises
> peripheral issues about which there is disagreement & which could make some people
> hesitate to subscribe to it even though they were in agreement with the basic purpose of
> the statement. If this is worth doing, it's worth doing right.

Can you modify the proposed text such that it would be something that you could sign? Such
an endorsement coming from you would carry significant weight.

Walt

===================================
Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>

In any consistent theory, there must
exist true but not provable statements.
(Godel's Theorem)

You can only find the truth with logic
If you have already found the truth
without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
===================================
Received on Fri Jan 30 09:50:56 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 30 2004 - 09:50:56 EST