RE: NT truth (formerly inerrancy?)

From: Stephen J. Krogh, P.G. <panterragroup@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon Jan 05 2004 - 12:24:37 EST

> -----Original Message-----

> From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On

> Behalf Of Sheila Wilson

> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 3:16 PM

> To: D. F. Siemens, Jr.

> Cc: hvantill@chartermi.net; asa@calvin.edu

> Subject: Re: NT truth (formerly inerrancy?)

>

>

I know the Bible is

> interpreted many different ways but any way that we think is correct must

> align with scripture. This includes science.

>

> Sheila

And there is the rub. To which interpretation must science align itself? If
science indicates something that is revealed through empirical data that
directly conflicts with an interpretation, do we look at other
interpretations or do we merely ignore the data?
Received on Mon Jan 5 12:24:17 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 05 2004 - 12:24:18 EST