Re: Darwinian and non-Darwinian (was Re: RFEP & ID)

From: Sarah Berel-Harrop (
Date: Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:19:13 EDT

  • Next message: Dr. Blake Nelson: "RE: Darwinian and non-Darwinian (was Re: RFEP & ID)"

    On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:04:01 -0400
      "Alexanian, Moorad" <> wrote:
    >One ought not to use examples that use non-scientific or nonphysical
    >terms such as the term "wrong."

    This discussion left the realm of science long ago.

    When one party introduces a legal term of art as some
    kind of argument that evolution ==> racism (an argument
    itself that did not even purport to be made in a
    scientific manner) it is, of course, perfectly
    reasonable to explain that term of art from the
    standpoint of its correct context, and not at all
    required to use scientific precision, as the term comes
    from the realm of law, not science.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 29 2003 - 12:19:24 EDT