From: Walter Hicks (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:49:22 EDT
Glenn Morton wrote:
> As to science, I reject YEC science for scientific reasons. It simply is
> laughably false as you note of Morris' entropy stuff. If you want a
> scientific reason to reject the appearance of age, then look at SN1987A.
> There is all the data needed to avoid appearance of age except in the face
> of the most vile deception possible. see http://home.entouch.net/dmd/age.htm
> down towards the bottom.
I give up, Glenn. You just hammer on the same old weather-beaten drum and
totally disregard anything that I say that might thwart your flawed logic. At
least there are some on the list who listen, understand and offer intelligent
rebuttal or agreement.
Now I shall just do what you usually do: Simply "give you the last word " while
I hop on my horse and ride off into the sunset to find more objective minds.
-- =================================== Walt Hicks <firstname.lastname@example.org>
In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 23 2003 - 21:50:03 EDT