From: Walter Hicks (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:15:48 EDT
allen roy wrote:
> Are these two points the only things worthy of
> discussion out of the entire posting?
No, Allen. I could comment on much of what you
said but, rather, I just take it in as
information. What you said was basically your
opinion and I respect that. I don't believe it to
be true but what is the sense of objecting?
The ones I spoke below are about facts, not
opinion. I could elaborate more and say that I
think Morris is a flat outright farce and anyone
who accepts his statements has no understanding of
basic physics whatsoever. I think that is probably
true of many at ICR. I agree with with Burgy's
line characterization as "Liars for Jesus"
>> > It is obvious that Morris interprets evidence
>> > within his understanding of truth,
>> > i.e. that sin was the origin of entropy.
>> No, What is obvious is that he is either
>> incompetent or intentionally lying. Being
>> kind, I will settle for incompetent --
>> although his devotion to his particular
>> Biblical "paradigm" may be the basic cause.
>> Morris' published theories fly in the face of
>> reproducible experiments -- not theories of
>> Biblical interpretation.
>> > And, just for the record, as some here
>> > already know, I am not a typical YEC. I
>> > believe that the Creation week involving the
>> > origin of the biosphere on this planet
>> > occurred only some 6000 years ago. However,
>> > the universe may well have been created
>> > ex nihilo long before that.
>> That makes you a heretic in the eyes of some
>> Biblical Literalists. Doesn't that bother you?
-- =================================== Walt Hicks <email@example.com>
In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 22 2003 - 21:15:08 EDT