Re: Post-Empiricism Science: A little surprised

Date: Wed Sep 17 2003 - 07:38:30 EDT

  • Next message: "Re: Evolution and Salvation"

    In a message dated 9/17/03 1:46:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time, writes:

    > The evolutionary paradigm is just as religious and sacred as a Creationary
    > paradigm. The only difference is that the evolutionary paradigm is based
    > upon
    > and accepted by blind faith. It is blind because it cannot be confirmed by
    > anyone who could know.

    T. Kuhn wrote that the strength of a hypothesis is in its explanatory value.
    The explanatory value of evolutionary theory is so strong and there is so much
    evidence for it that to dispute it at this point is to dig your head in the

    "If a paradigm is ever to triumph it must gain some first supporters, men who
    will develop it to
    the point where hard headed arguments can be produced and multiplied. And
    even those
    arguments when they come are not individually decisive.

    Because scientists are reasonable men, one or another argument will
    ultimately persuade many
    of them. But there is no single argument that can or should persuade them
    all. Rather than a
    single group conversion, what occurs is an increasing shift in the
    distribution of professional

    At the start, a new candidate for paradigm may have few supporters, and on
    occasion the
    supporters' motives may be suspect. Nevertheless, if they are competent, they
    will improve it,
    explore its possibilities and show what it would be like to belong to the
    community guided by
    it. And as that goes on, if the paradigm is one destined to win its fight,
    the number and
    strength of the professional arguments in its favor will increase.

    More scientists will then be converted and the exploration of the new
    paradigm will go on.
    Gradually the number of experiments, instruments, articles and books based
    upon the
    paradigm will multiply. Still more men, convinced of the new view's
    fruitfulness will adopt the
    new mode of practicing normal science, until at last only a few elderly
    hold-outs remain.

    Though the historian can always find men, Priestley, for instance, who were
    unreasonable to
    resist for as long as they did, he will not find a point at which resistance
    becomes illogical or
    unscientific. At most he may wish to say that the man who continues to resist
    after his whole
    profession has been converted has ipso facto ceased to be a scientist."

                            The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas S.
                                    Chapter: Resolution of Revolutions

    rich faussette

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Sep 17 2003 - 07:41:32 EDT