From: Walter Hicks (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Sep 17 2003 - 07:18:26 EDT
Mtheikns it is a wesael?
Glenn Morton wrote:
> This is a perfect illustration of why it is
> unlikely that the calculations of low
> probability made by ID and creationist folk for
> proteins and DNA is just simply wrong. If
> functionality can be preserved in the face of
> such extreme mutations of the sentence, then the
> probabilities for finding a randomly generated
> meaningful sentence is quite high relative to
> current calculations.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Behalf Of Walter Hicks
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:11
> To: ASA
> Subject: [Fwd: Raednig is esay]
> For those of us who are proof reading
> impaired, the following is interesting
> My spell checker hated this email.
> -------- Original Message --------
Subject: Raednig is esay
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:13:18
From: "Tom Wiener"
> The brain does amazing things, doesn't
> Instructions: Just read the sentence
> straight through
> Acocdrnig to an elgnsih unviesitry
> sutdy the oredr of letetrs in a word
> dosen't mttaer, the olny thnig thta's
> iopmrantt is that the frsit and lsat
> ltteer of eevry word is in the crrecot
> ptoision. The rset can be jmbueld and
> one is stlil able to raed the txet
> wiohtut dclftfuiiy.
-- =================================== Walt Hicks <email@example.com>
In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Sep 17 2003 - 07:20:15 EDT