RE: [Fwd: Raednig is esay]

From: Glenn Morton (
Date: Tue Sep 16 2003 - 22:14:20 EDT

  • Next message: allenroy: "Re: Post-Empiricism Science: A little surprised"

    This is a perfect illustration of why it is unlikely that the calculations
    of low probability made by ID and creationist folk for proteins and DNA is
    just simply wrong. If functionality can be preserved in the face of such
    extreme mutations of the sentence, then the probabilities for finding a
    randomly generated meaningful sentence is quite high relative to current
      -----Original Message-----
      From: []On
    Behalf Of Walter Hicks
      Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:11 AM
      To: ASA
      Subject: [Fwd: Raednig is esay]

      For those of us who are proof reading impaired, the following is
      My spell checker hated this email.


      -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Raednig is esay
            Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:13:18 -0400
            From: "Tom Wiener" <>
            Reply-To: <>
            To: <>

      The brain does amazing things, doesn't it?

      Instructions: Just read the sentence straight through

      Acocdrnig to an elgnsih unviesitry sutdy the oredr of letetrs in a word
    dosen't mttaer, the olny thnig thta's iopmrantt is that the frsit and lsat
    ltteer of eevry word is in the crrecot ptoision. The rset can be jmbueld and
    one is stlil able to raed the txet wiohtut dclftfuiiy.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 16 2003 - 22:17:14 EDT