From: Rich Blinne (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Sep 10 2003 - 21:54:06 EDT
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:29:32 -0700, "D. F. Siemens, Jr."
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 04:27:33 -0700 "Don Winterstein"
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Others have pointed out that YEC protagonists are often very slick and
> polished, with ready answers to lots of questions, and you confront them
> publicly before a general audience at your peril.
Here's a question that is too early to develop an official answer.
Today's Nature has an article that confirmed the Biblical date of the
Siloam Tunnel (http://www.nature.com/nsu/030908/030908-9.html). The
question to ask is the radio carbon dating of this accurate or not. If
yes, why is radio carbon not accurate for other things? If no, then how
did it get to be right since unbelieving science is always trying to
disprove the Bible?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Sep 10 2003 - 21:57:45 EDT