From: Freeman, Louise Margaret (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Sep 01 2003 - 12:47:55 EDT
> Science is fine for telling us the present. However, it cannot validly
> extrapolate to the past and ignore God's Word. God created the Universe
> for man.
> It says so in the Bible. If He he did so, why waste 15 billion years
> when it is
> just as easy for Him to bring it into existence in 6 days as the Bible
Why waste 6 days when it is just as easy for Him to bring it into
existance in 0.00000000000000000000001 nanoseconds or less?
>That does not dispute what science sees in an "apparent"
If "apparent" is defined as "what is observed and supported by empirical
data" (as opposed to "what is revealed by the Bible"),it sounds like a
fairly good synonym for methodological naturalism. So what's so
controversial about teaching this "apparent" old earth, along
with "apparent" abiogenesis, "apparent" speciation and "apparent" natural
selection, in science classes?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2003 - 12:50:51 EDT