From: Howard J. Van Till (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Jun 25 2003 - 07:55:04 EDT
Thanks for the excerpts from Hitchcock re his reasons for adopting a
concordist strategy in relating the Bible and science (especially geology).
Your summary was:
> (1) Why be a concordist? Short answer: it's a great spiritual benefit to
> have geology support Genesis.
I'm wondering now if this also represents the views of persons on this list
who take a similar concordist approach -- arguing that the the results of
the empirical natural sciences provide support for the Bible, when properly
Anyone else care to comment?
Howard Van Till
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jun 25 2003 - 08:27:29 EDT