From: Peter Ruest (email@example.com)
Date: Sun Jun 15 2003 - 10:02:49 EDT
D. F. Siemens wrote to Vernon Jenkins:
> George is too careful a student of both scripture and science to adopt a
> concordist stance. Despite its popularity among OEC, it is about a messed
> up as YEC. Genesis 1 is in no way a schedule or engineer's log of
> creation events. Please be more careful of views you ascribe to others.
Please be more careful of views you ascribe to others - about
"concordists" see the email I addressed to Don Winterstein, with CC to
you. All the problems you mention - and many more - are discussed in A.
Held & P. Rüst, "Genesis reconsidered", PSCF 51/4 (Dec. 1999), 231-243;
-- Dr. Peter Ruest, CH-3148 Lanzenhaeusern, Switzerland <firstname.lastname@example.org> - Biochemistry - Creation and evolution "..the work which God created to evolve it" (Genesis 2:3)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 10:01:38 EDT