Re: The forgotten verses

From: D. F. Siemens, Jr. (
Date: Sat Jun 14 2003 - 23:31:18 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Roberts: "Re: The forgotten verses"

    The most common view on the list has been stated so often that there is
    no point in belaboring it again. It seem to me that you either don't read
    or don't remember anything that does not coincide with your view.

    On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 21:31:37 +0100 "Vernon Jenkins"
    <> writes:

    You make the point "Genesis 1 is in no way a schedule or engineer's log
    of creation events."

    Pray tell us what you believe it to be.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jun 14 2003 - 23:47:23 EDT