From: Debbie Mann (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Jun 02 2003 - 22:47:46 EDT
I think Mr. Faussette likes to stir things up. Throw a little snippet about
chattels producing superior offspring and then call out, "Why are you
persecuting me - I'm just stating facts?" when he's asked if he supports
such things. The poor innocent who leaves a candle burning on a rickety
table and then protests that he didn't start the fire - someone else must
have knocked it over.
The Canadian internet article is scary. Freedom goes, one step at a time.
That's certainly worth getting all het up about. What does one do?
As far as the archeology thing goes - the review reminds me of the
explanation of the Bible by Isaac Asimov. I really liked him until I started
reading that. The best I can say for his approach is it was highly
skeptical - and I think that is far too generous. Christianity survived
Asimov and I'm sure it will survive these 'experts' as well. The experts all
claimed there wasn't a David until recently when archeologists discovered
several artefacts which confirmed the early monarchy. These authors better
hurry with their 'proof'. More real proof could be surfacing any time.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2003 - 22:46:33 EDT