Date: Sun Jun 01 2003 - 14:07:42 EDT
As I have thought about things, I have one more question. Given that
I have found many more YECs and anti-geologists in 2.5 years of
searching than have been found by others in 25 years, What is the
1) in approach by 19th century historians, who everytime a 19th
century person is quoted as saying that there is a battle between
science and religion going on, denies vigorously the validity of that
statment and any implication flowing from that statment
2) the young-earth creationist, who everytime a scientific experiment
or data point contradicts their view of earth history, denies
vigorously the validity of that data point and any implication
flowing from that data point?
Seems to me to be a very similar methodology.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jun 01 2003 - 19:32:46 EDT