RE: "partisan liberal pieces"

From: Debbie Mann (deborahjmann@insightbb.com)
Date: Sat May 31 2003 - 10:22:44 EDT

  • Next message: Sondra Brasile: "RE: "partisan liberal pieces""

    RFaussette wrote:
    In orthodox Jewish communities eugenics is the norm and women are still
    chattel.

    And this is good? Galations 3:23? Obviously the Jews do not accept
    Galations.
    The O.T.'s virtuous woman from Proverbs is hardly chattel. Deborah was a
    judge. The O.T. has many strong women and the N.T. as well.

    It sounds as though you are saying, 'far better keep women as chattel' as a
    solution to having homosexuals in society. Is that the gist of your
    argument?

      -----Original Message-----
      From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
    Behalf Of RFaussette@aol.com
      Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 8:24 AM
      To: lfreeman@mbc.edu; asa@calvin.edu
      Subject: Re: "partisan liberal pieces"

      In a message dated 5/30/03 5:52:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
    lfreeman@mbc.edu writes:

        The liberal press is quick to praise the "biological basis for
    homosexuality" as support for the view that the orientation is "natural"
    therefore "good" (or at least "not bad") and quick to critcize the
    "biological basis for behavioral and cognitive sex differences" as a
    dangerous plot by right wing conspirators to keep women subordinate to men.

        My point is, the theories inspiring the research and the methodologies
    by which it is conducted are largely the same. And one type is no more
        "partisan" and no less "science" than the other.

      The liberal press is quick to praise the "biological basis for
    homosexuality" because it weakens indigenous populations, feminizing the
    male population and lowering birth rates. The neo-cons (liberals in
    disguise, wolves in sheep's clothing) are mostly red diaper babies.

      The liberals are of course quick to criticize the "biological basis for
    behavioral and cognitive sex differences" because that makes all races
    equally capable. By doing that the liberals disguise the efficacy of
    eugenics to advance the interests of specific populations who alone remain
    to practice eugenics giving them a singular advantage by militating against
    their being "spewed out of the land."

      The liberal press should be studiously ignored except to guage how much
    damage they are doing.

      rich



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 31 2003 - 10:22:01 EDT