From: Walter Hicks (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat May 31 2003 - 09:30:09 EDT
I believe that I have studied your pages in the past, but now I cannot even find what I thought I had read. Could you list the specific URL(s)?. Thanks
> Wally wrote: "I think, John, that one can argue for any one of a number of things based upon so called logic. The question to me is what does one define as "sin"."
> I quite agree.
> "Are we free to make our own definitions or do we believe that there is a higher standard set down by God and described in what we call our holy
> As my statement on my website says clearly, and as I have stated here several times, What God calls sin I must also call sin.
> What I also claim is that a good case can (and has) been made that an intimate same-sex union of two adults is no more sin than a union of a male/female. The case continues by noting that persons claiming otherwise may be adding to God's word.
> I hope that much is clear and that you will take the time to study the several positions (including ones favorable to your peresent view) on my website.
> Burgy (John Burgeson)
> The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
> Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
> Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
-- =================================== Walt Hicks <email@example.com>
In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 31 2003 - 09:34:10 EDT