From: John W Burgeson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 15:11:40 EDT
Rich had a good post about Howard's comments. He wrote, in part: "So,
what does this mean for the scientific Christian? It means that the
choice between miracles -- properly defined -- and naturalism is a false
one. Belief in both is not at all inconsistent."
I am in substantial agreement with the entie post and, in particular,
that part I have quoted above. Proper definitions, as Epicurius once
wrote, is the #1 rule of science. (For all three of Epicurus's rules, and
their citations, see page 6 of my web site).
John Burgeson (Burgy)
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri May 23 2003 - 10:06:23 EDT