Re: Feedback on Howell

From: Steve Bishop (
Date: Mon May 05 2003 - 15:01:34 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Roberts: "Re: The Nature of Atheist - Christian dialogue"


    I haven't read or seen the book, though there is a review in
    Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith Index: Vol. 54:3, September 2002
    It's on line at:

    I am highly dubious of the Two Book's metaphor. (Why only two?)

    "Those who inclined towards developing the idea of neutrality, or
    separateness, or autonomy, of science took a position that became epitomized
    in the metaphor of the two books, the Book of Scripture and the Book of
    Nature, both created by God as manifestations of His omnipotence and
    omniscience, but books different in character that had to be kept apart." F
    E Manuel _The Religion of Isaac Newton_ (Oxford: Oxford University Press,
    1974) pp 27-8

    Hardly a position Van Til or Kuyper would endorse!!


    >From: James Mahaffy <>
    >Subject: Feedback on Howell
    >Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 09:55:47 -0500
    >A colleague suggested I read and loaned me Ken Howell's book, God's Two
    >Before I set aside the time to dig through it, I would appreciate some
    >feedback on how important this book is. Is his thinking considered
    >important in either evangelical and also in broader (not christian)
    >academic circles?
    >Finally, does anyone know how Ken's movement from reformed commitment to
    >Roman catholicism impacted his thinking. I ask that since I come from a
    >reformed perspective (Kuiperian or Van Tilian [Cornelius]).
    >I will cc this to the Christian biology list too
    >James and Florence Mahaffy 712 722-0381 (Home)
    >227 S. Main St. 712 722-6279 (Office)
    >Sioux Center, IA 51250

    Hotmail messages direct to your mobile phone

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 05 2003 - 15:01:49 EDT