From: George Murphy (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Mar 15 2003 - 10:09:48 EST
Jim Armstrong wrote:
> Of course PJ is a Professor or Law, not a scientist. His arguments flow
> from a specific agenda and seem more those of the courtroom, using facts
> in selective ways in order to create doubt. I think that is evident in
> what he calls his "Wedge strategy". He describes his agenda pretty well at
> I presume this is discussed as well in his recent book "Wedge of Truth".
To the statement that "PJ is a Professor or Law, not a scientist" should be
added "nor a theologian."
His comments about Kenneth Miller can be seen as the familiar lawyer's tactic of
discrediting a witness.
George L. Murphy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 10:10:12 EST