Re: Johnson on Bible Answer Man

From: Jim Armstrong (
Date: Sat Mar 15 2003 - 09:50:45 EST

  • Next message: George Murphy: "Re: Johnson on Bible Answer Man"

    Of course PJ is a Professor or Law, not a scientist. His arguments flow
    from a specific agenda and seem more those of the courtroom, using facts
    in selective ways in order to create doubt. I think that is evident in
    what he calls his "Wedge strategy". He describes his agenda pretty well at
    I presume this is discussed as well in his recent book "Wedge of Truth". wrote:

    > Jim Armstrong wrote:
    >> From PJ's own web site it looks like the latest on the subject is 1995
    > Even more disturbing is that PJ seems to know Kenneth Miller
    > fairly well as he debated him in 1996. Why he would basically
    > call him something just short of a seditionist is beyond me.
    > (
    > [PJs comments on Ken were the original reason for this post.]
    > by Grace along indeed, we proceed,
    > Wayne

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 15 2003 - 09:54:04 EST