From: John Burgeson (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:27:53 EST
>From: allenroy <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: Re: test questions-old topic
>Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:23:30 -0700
>John Burgeson wrote:
>>I read one in ICR's ACTS & FACTS last month on their RATE project.
>>Unfortunately (or maybe fortunately) I discarded it. Something to do with
>>helium trapped in rock formations providing evedence of a young earth.
>I think you are refering to the notice on page 2 of the March Acts and
>Facts: See the PDF file below.
>"I have been shown that, without Bible history, geology can prove nothing.
>in the earth do give evidence of a state of things differing in many
>respects from the
>present. But the time of their existence, and how long a period these
>things have been in
>the earth, are only to be understood by Bible history. It may be innocent
>beyond Bible history, if our suppositions do not contradict the facts found
>in the sacred
>Scriptures. But when men leave the word of God in regard to the history of
>seek to account for God's creative works upon natural principles, they are
>boundless ocean of uncertainty. Just how God accomplished the work of
>creation in six
>literal days, he has never revealed to mortals. His creative works are just
>incomprehensible as his existence." Ellen Gould Harmon White, 1864
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 13 2003 - 13:28:04 EST