From: Marcio Pie (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:47:22 EST
There's a very interesting article by Michael Ruse in the latest issue
of Science entitled "Is Evolution a Secular Religion?"
This is his last paragraph:
"So, what does our history tell us? Three things. First, if the claim is
that all contemporary evolutionism is merely an excuse to promote moral
and societal norms, this is simply false. Today's professional
evolutionism is no more a secular religion than is industrial chemistry.
Second, there is indeed a thriving area of more popular evolutionism,
where evolution is used to underpin claims about the nature of the
universe, the meaning of it all for us humans, and the way we should
behave. I am not saying that this area is all bad or that it should be
stamped out. I am all in favor of saving the rainforests. I am saying
that this popular evolutionism--often an alternative to
religion--exists. Third, we who cherish science should be careful to
distinguish when we are doing science and when we are extrapolating from
it, particularly when we are teaching our students. If it is science
that is to be taught, then teach science and nothing more. Leave the
other discussions for a more appropriate time."
Very interesting conclusions from someone who doesn't consider himself a
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:48:19 EST