RE: An interesting essay for evangelicals

From: Alexanian, Moorad (
Date: Thu Jan 23 2003 - 20:27:43 EST

  • Next message: "Reinventing the Male Homosexual: The Rhetoric and Power of the Gay Gene"

    It is clear that effeminate and homosexual are not necessarily synonymous since otherwise Paul would not have included both in the list. It is also clear that all of us share one or more of these sins but if we recognize them as sinful acts and repent the Lord will find us acceptable. It is excusing one’s constant practice or condoning any of these acts as sinful that is not acceptable to the Lord. Condoning any of these sins is a sin in itself. Moorad

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Robert Schneider []
            Sent: Thu 1/23/2003 3:25 PM
            To: Alexanian, Moorad; John Burgeson;
            Subject: Re: An interesting essay for evangelicals

            Regarding Moorad's citation of 1 Cor. 6:9-10, below:
            In my previous note I commented on 1 Cor. 6:9-10, and realize now that I
            should have elaborated on the meaning of the Greek word "arsenokotais." In
            the translation Moorad quotes below, "arsenokotais" is translated
            "homosexuals." Yet, there is good evidence from the original texts that the
            Greek word does not convey the generic notion of a homosexual, but refers to
            a person who engages in male prostitution. The problem with the translation
            "homosexual" is that it imposes our modern understanding upon an ancient
            word and turns it into a generic rather than the specific term this rare
            Greek word appears to convey. The translation of "makaroi" as "effeminate"
            may also be misleading since the term in our culture is popularly used to
            refer to gay persons, despite the fact that there is plenty of evidence that
            men who display body language interpreted as efffeminate (and women who
            display such evidence as "masculate") may well be and often are heterosexual
            (while many tough-looking, handsome, heterosexually-looking men are gay).
            The Greek word probably meant something else to Paul, though it is not
            entirely clear to me what. It must have a negative connotation given the
            other terms it is lumped with. I agree with Moorad that Paul has cast his
            net widely to give examples of those who are unrighteous, which may put all
            of us under judgment, though perhaps Paul is speaking of persons who
            behavior is habitually unrighteous, since another translation (NRSV) of this
            Greek word "adikoi" is "wrongdoers." At any rate Paul continues (v. 11,
            NRSV), "And this is what some of you [NB: not all] used to be. But you were
            washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord
            Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God." So, we believers have
            justification and the power of the Spirit to aid us in falling into, or
            reverting to, habitual wrongdoing of whatever specific kind.
            Grace and peace,
            ----- Original Message -----
            From: "Alexanian, Moorad" <>
            To: "John Burgeson" <>; <>
            Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:12 PM
            Subject: RE: An interesting essay for evangelicals
    > First, I was not shouting. I just copied the verses from the Internet and
            did not bother to rewrite what I had copied. I have given much thought to
            the issue Christianity/homosexuality. You have a gut feeling that it is not
            a choice to become a homosexual; I have the opposite gut feeling. I read a
            book sometime ago that said that homosexuality is a choice but it is rooted
            in the nurturing of a boy before his third birthday. “Or do you not know
            that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be
            deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor
            effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards,
            nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God.” 1 Cor.
            6:9-10. This speaks to all of us! Moorad
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: John Burgeson []
    > Sent: Thu 1/23/2003 12:35 PM
    > To: Alexanian, Moorad;
    > Cc:
    > Subject: RE: An interesting essay for evangelicals
    > Moorad, instead of accepting my challenge to you to do some tough studying
    > (yes -- it is tough -- I came to my present position from yours only after
    > burning a lot of midnight oil, reading both sides of the issue, etc.) you
    > instead tossed off the following:
    > "I believe Jesus does address the issue of homosexuality in Mark 10:6-8
    > “But from the beginning of creation, God MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE. FOR
    > BECOME ONE FLESH; so they are no longer two, but one flesh.” Jesus
    > certainly defines what Christian marriage is. So much for homosexual
    > marriages!"
    > No need to shout. Jesus likely did not when he said that.
    > To say "Jesus defined what Christian marriage is" from those verses is
    > a stretch. The fundementalist "proof text" approach almost never works,
    > except perhaps to a biblical literalist.
    > I accept that heterosexual marriages are both a norm and a desired goal.
    > What I do not accept (because scripture does not ask me to accept) is that
    > homosexual unions are necessarily a sin.
    > John W. Burgeson (Burgy)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 23 2003 - 20:28:15 EST