From: Jim Eisele (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Oct 10 2002 - 15:53:43 EDT
If I dare interject into this well researched thread...
What is at stake here? If we accept Genesis as accurate, the
genealogies must have had a source pre-(what, 1500 BC?)
The Bible can be just as accurate (or inaccurate) no matter
how it was transmitted.
Sorry to interject. Just my two cents worth.
A slightly chilly Jim. My heating just went out, and now I have
to get my condo management group to see this as a priority.
They didn't teach me this in college! BTW, my recent "temp
job" blossomed into a bona fide full-time position! Every now
and then, you catch a break :-)
Genesis in Question
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Oct 10 2002 - 23:29:45 EDT