Re: A falsifiable test Re: AiG bites the dust

From: Walter Hicks (
Date: Mon Sep 30 2002 - 20:57:50 EDT

  • Next message: allenroy: "Re: AiG bites the dust"

    John Burgeson wrote:

    > >>In the above case and supported by AiG and ICR , _only_ mankind is the
    > >>object to
    > the Lord's intent in this universe.
    > Therefore, all attempts to find other intelligence in this universe are
    > completely doomed to failure.
    > Hence, The SETI activity is a ěfalsifiable?criterion. If SETI ever reveals
    > an
    > extra terrestrial intelligence, then a young earth has been falsified. Other
    > wise it has not.
    > Whatcha think about them for apples?
    > >>
    > Won't fly, I think. My memory is hazy on this, but I dees to remember Gish
    > or Morris addressing the issue of extra terrestrial intelligences (material,
    > not angelic) and commenting that the ICR thesis did not necessarily suggest
    > either an absence or a presence of such.

    What? Even more unsupported claims ? Then it is time to challenge that type of
    hype again. They are your friends (or so you say) , not mine. Perhaps
    it is time
    for you to get more aggressive and _demand_ an alternative -- or an admission
    that they are not scientists in _any_ sense of the word. (I often have the same
    complaint about some of the ASA "theologians" on this list ---- including
    some of those who claim to have scientific credentials.....)


    Walt Hicks <>

    In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem)

    You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 22:48:09 EDT