From: Walter Hicks (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Sep 24 2002 - 13:53:19 EDT
Jim Eisele wrote:
> I'm realistic enough not to expect agreement. But, the stakes are high,
> and some will drop out along the way. My claim is that the Bible is
> historical until shown otherwise.
I will second this. Why is it not a reasonable position? Is it not what we
generally follow with respect to scientific theories?
Why, I'd bet that even a good lawyer might agree ;-).
-- =================================== Walt Hicks <email@example.com>
In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 24 2002 - 14:12:47 EDT