RE: Adam from dust (was RE: Oldest Hominid-new entry from Chad)

From: Don Perrett-VP GPA (
Date: Thu Sep 19 2002 - 04:16:51 EDT

  • Next message: Walter Hicks: "Re: The Flood Hoax"

    >Dust must be interpreted more broadly than just dirt.
    >Dust of the ground consists of about 95% silicon dioxide,
    >montmorillonite [(Na,Ca)0,3(Al,Mg)2Si4O10(OH)2Ín(H2O) ],
    >illite [ (K,H3O)(Al,Mg,Fe)2(Si,Al)4O10[(OH)2,(H2O)] ],
    >and other inorganic minerals.
    >If we were really made of dust as we use the word,
    >we would be mostly metallic.

    My question would be, in what way are we related to the ground/earth? Are
    we not carbon based? Are we not a part of the earth, which is part of the
    solar system, which is part of the galaxy, which is part of the universe,
    which is part of GOD? If so, then where is the errancy in the OT?

    Don Perrett

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Sep 19 2002 - 18:24:32 EDT