Re: The Flood Hoax

From: Jim Eisele (jeisele@starpower.net)
Date: Wed Sep 18 2002 - 16:16:34 EDT

  • Next message: John W Burgeson: ":-)"

    John writes

    >1. Believe the flood happened
    >2. Deny the flood happened
    >3. Willing to consider both possibilities

    >I take position 3.

    The idea of a false flood account is sheer nonsense.
    You may as well just pitch the entire OT. Such a view is
    not "enlightened", it is naive.

    My post was originally much longer, but "there ain't no
    point in talking if nobody's listening."

    Jim Eisele
    Genesis in Question
    http://genesisinquestion.org



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Sep 18 2002 - 22:24:11 EDT