Re: The Flood Hoax

From: Jim Eisele (
Date: Wed Sep 18 2002 - 16:16:34 EDT

  • Next message: John W Burgeson: ":-)"

    John writes

    >1. Believe the flood happened
    >2. Deny the flood happened
    >3. Willing to consider both possibilities

    >I take position 3.

    The idea of a false flood account is sheer nonsense.
    You may as well just pitch the entire OT. Such a view is
    not "enlightened", it is naive.

    My post was originally much longer, but "there ain't no
    point in talking if nobody's listening."

    Jim Eisele
    Genesis in Question

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Sep 18 2002 - 22:24:11 EDT