From: John Burgeson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Sep 18 2002 - 11:05:29 EDT
Jim wrote: "I'm not sure what value there is to denying all of the evidence
for a local flood."
Please do not fall into the dyatic fallacy trap here. There are not just two
flood positions, but (at least) three:
1. Believe the flood happened
2. Deny the flood happened
3. Willing to consider both possibilities
I take position 3. If I were convinced that it was an "important" issue, I'd
have to spend more time in study to assume either #1 or #2. I don't have
"So, if this is your biggest beef with Scripture, you are in good shape."
Scripturally maybe. But my doctor tells me to drop a few pounds. What does
he know? He's been telling me that for years and I haven't listened yet. < G
Join the worldís largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Sep 18 2002 - 13:54:12 EDT