From: Jim Eisele (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Sep 15 2002 - 16:15:42 EDT
>>"If the original manuscripts/tablets are inerrant, the Bible is
>>more reliable. ... ."
>Yes, and if horses could fly ... .
>My point is that (1) we don't know what the originals said
I agree, somewhat (searching for some common ground :-)
>(2) to therefore claim inerrancy for them is an empty claim, having no
Hmmm (scratching head), then what becomes authoritative? John, have
you gone and started your own religion? I'm not trying to be sarcastic,
just trying to find a logical conclusion for your statements.
Genesis in Question
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 23:01:12 EDT