RE: The Flood Hoax

From: Jim Eisele (
Date: Sun Sep 15 2002 - 16:15:42 EDT

  • Next message: Craig Rusbult: "Re: Critique of ID & No Free Lunch"

    John writes

    >>"If the original manuscripts/tablets are inerrant, the Bible is
    >>more reliable. ... ."

    >Yes, and if horses could fly ... .


    >My point is that (1) we don't know what the originals said

    I agree, somewhat (searching for some common ground :-)

    >(2) to therefore claim inerrancy for them is an empty claim, having no

    Hmmm (scratching head), then what becomes authoritative? John, have
    you gone and started your own religion? I'm not trying to be sarcastic,
    just trying to find a logical conclusion for your statements.

    Jim Eisele
    Genesis in Question

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Sep 15 2002 - 23:01:12 EDT