RE: Response on coal

From: Glenn Morton (
Date: Mon Aug 26 2002 - 23:43:19 EDT

  • Next message: Glenn Morton: "A 2.7 million year old human gene"

    It is not that I am not interested, it is that I see nothing new in any of
    our discussions. THere is little reason to go round the merry-go-round


    for lots of creation/evolution information
    personal stories of struggle

    >-----Original Message-----
    >From: []On
    >Behalf Of James Mahaffy
    >Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:30 AM
    >Subject: Re: Response on coal
    >Bill is one of the few YEC folks who is a geologist that has looked at
    >coal. He has also gotten into some of the literature, which is good to
    >see. He assumes (and I suspect rightly) that most folks don't give much
    >consideration to Austin's floating vegetation mat theory. Since he knows
    >something about coal, I thought that some of us that do know something
    >about coal should respond.
    >At this stage, I decided to make my response to Bill private.
    >>From lack of other responses, I suspect either not a lot of you have
    >studied coal or do not care to be involved in the exchanges. Besides it
    >is MUCH easier for me to respond privately than publicly.
    >James and Florence Mahaffy 712 722-0381 (Home)
    >227 S. Main St. 712 722-6279 (Office)
    >Sioux Center, IA 51250

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 27 2002 - 23:19:43 EDT